This blog post is the first of three posts about revising a previously written family history. The focus of this post is Content and Format. The next post discusses Citation of Sources. The third post, Evaluating Sources, includes types of sources. Examples from my own work are incorporated throughout.
When I grew serious about genealogy 10 years ago, one goal stood out– to write and publish a history of dad’s paternal family, Posten. Writing the family history became more important following Aunt Grace’s death in 2011. Aunt Mary, dad’s youngest sister, is the only one of Dad’s siblings still alive. I finally completed the history in 2012 and sent copies to a few people, including Aunt Mary. The original manuscript traces our family back to Thomas Postens (1782-1854), dispels an oral family tradition about Thomas’ parents and grandparents, mentions family histories of several women who married Posten men (maiden names of Richards, Fulkerson, LaCoe) and discusses our possible relationship to Poston/ Poste/ Posten families found in late 1700s/ early 1800s Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The document represents over 20 years of genealogical research.
The format of the first edition is relatively informal. Yes, I presented facts and noted sources. I also included information about the research process, such as moving forwards and backwards in time to discover the names of all 8 children of one family and the mother’s maiden name. Journal type entries are common. I documented process as well as results. In essence, I created a working document rather than a finished piece.
My sister commented that the history was ‘confusing’. When I read the document again in 2014, I realized what she meant. It all made perfect sense to me! But, it may not make sense or seem logical to others. For example, in each generation, I began numbering individuals again with number 1. My reasoning? I thought it would be easier for my elderly aunt, and others, to understand. While that may be true, random numbering does not meet any genealogical standard. Over the years, I have read and consulted multiple published family histories. Each one seems to have its own numbering system!
How important is it to follow a genealogical standard for numbering? Some may consider this irrelevant. I respect their opinion, especially if the system is logical and easily followed by readers. Identifying your readers guides your choice of numbering. A sequential numbering system in which each person has a unique number, starting with ‘1’, is one possibility. However, if you plan to submit part or all of your work for publication elsewhere, such as an historical society journal, follow the guidelines for that journal. A recognized numbering system improves the quality of your work in the eyes of others. An item added to my research toolbox is the 2008 summary by Joan Curran, Madilyn Crane and John Wray, Numbering your genealogy. 
Since 2012, I attended several workshops and webinars about publishing and consulted with a professional genealogist. Participation in the Genealogy Do-Over helps me to refine research skills and extend my research toolbox. I began to look more critically at each piece of data and each document. Right now, I am still stuck on finding my great-grandfather, Daniel S. Posten (born 1859) and his parents, James D. Posten and Meriam Mills, in 1870 census. This particular objective has been temporarily put aside. See how my thought processes work? Not always in a straight, linear fashion!
Back to writing, revising, and eventual formal publication of the Posten family history. Based on what I have learned, recommendations include:
- Choose and follow a specific numbering convention for lineage. Rationale: Follow a specific, recognized genealogical numbering system.
- Reorganize content, start with Dad and work backwards in time. Include facts and stories about direct ancestors with only 1-2 paragraphs about collateral and ‘possibly related families’. Rationale: Less confusing while still acknowledging real and possible relationships.
- Describe research process as addendum to relevant chapter or section. Rationale: readers can choose to read or skip this information.
- Add family group sheet at end of each chapter, as relevant. Rationale: provides overview of family, including siblings of direct ancestor.
- Write articles about collateral families (surnames of women who married Posten men) and other ‘possibly related families’. Delete most, if not all, appendices. Rationale: Less confusing to readers. Shows readers that additional information is available, if they are interested.
- Insert footnotes at bottom of each page in addition to a reference/ source list at the end of each chapter. Rationale: When readers copy individual pages, they often copy only that page and may not also copy or refer to the list of references at the end of the chapter.
- Revise entries for footnotes and reference/source lists. Rationale: Follow recognized system with complete and accurate citation of sources, recording the “specific location of each piece of data” and “details that affect the use or evaluation of that data.” Location does not necessarily refer to the library where you found the item but to the item itself. (Citation of sources, including footnote entries, will be addressed in another post).
- Locate print copies of as many sources as possible. Whenever possible, cite the print item rather than online image. Rationale: This is a personal preference. I prefer to handle the actual book or journal article or document. The original item sometimes has additional information that is not included online. If print copy is not readily available, use online copy of the original source, such as online copy of print book.
- Locate original sources for online images and indexes, as needed. Consult and reference the original sources/ repositories. Rationale: Many online images are from sources other than the website on which found. Online indexes use other sources to create the index. Example: The National Archives & Records Administration (NARA) is the repository for U.S. Federal census records, not online websites which show images of those records and/or provide an index of the names on the original census record. However, if using an online website, acknowledge the website as the place where you found the record as well as citing NARA as the original repository.
Here’s the original sequence of chapters and proposed changes:
|Chapter||Working Manuscript- 2012||Proposed Changes- 2017|
|1||Posten Name||The Posten name: origins, derivative spellings, history of Pennsylvania county formation & relevance|
|2||Family origins- original immigrant. (moved to Chapter 8 in proposed revision)||Daniel Richard Posten (1917-1998) & Eunice Bertha Tucker (1919-2007)- my parents. Include info about meeting George Avery Posten in 1980s. Add brief info about Tucker family.|
|3||Pennsylvania Posten families early 1800s. Summary of Poston histories (moved to Chapter 8 in proposed revision). Pennsylvania county formation (moved to Chapter 1 in proposed revision).||John Ray Posten (1898-1948) & Jennie A. Richards (1884-1964) – my grandparents. Brief info about Richards family.|
|4||Jacob Postens. Includes descendent list from 1700s to 1900s. (revision – brief mention in ‘who’s the daddy’ chapter).||Daniel S. Posten (1859-1918) & Elizabeth Phoebe Fulkerson (1860-1938). Brief info about Fulkerson family.|
|5||Richard, Samuel, William Postens (included summary of Samuel Posten descendants in New Jersey). (revision – moved to ‘who’s the daddy’ chapter)||James D. Posten (1829-1914) & Meriam Mills (1834-1897). Brief info about Mills family.|
|6||Thomas Postens||Thomas Postens (1784-1852) & Esther Brown (1790 -1841). Brief info about contradictory information for children of their daughter, Phoebe. Mention Elihu Posten as caretaker of Thomas’ deaf son after Thomas’ death.|
|7||James D. Postens||Who’s the daddy?’ of Thomas Postens. Evidence for & against each possibility. Omit detailed descendant lists.|
|8||Daniel S. Posten. Includes Fulkerson/ Fulkerson.||Beginnings. Original immigrant. 1700s – early 1800s. Poston family histories. Summary of PA Posten families in other parts of the state, specifically Huntingdon county.|
|9||John Ray Posten. Includes Richards & LaCoe.||Summary. Include complete descendant list for Thomas Postens.|
|10||Daniel Richard Posten||Not needed.|
|Appendices||Appendix A. Benjamin Avery Posten, Missouri||Omit appendix. Ancestor of George Avery Posten. Article for Oklahoma Historical Society journal. Refer to article in relevant chapter.|
|Appendix B. Elihu Postens, Monroe Co, PA||Omit appendix. Brief mention in Thomas Postens’ chapter as caretaker of Thomas’ son deaf son after Thomas’ death. Article for Monroe County Historical Society.|
|Appendix C. William Poste/ Posten of Bucks & Huntingdon counties. Included info about other Posten families in Huntingdon county. Proposed lineage & link to James Posten & Rhoda Shafer of Iowa.||Omit appendix. Brief mention about William in ‘Who’s the daddy’ chapter. Series of articles: 1) William & Peter Poste to Huntingdon County PA Historical Society. 2)Other Posten families in Huntingdon County PA. 3) James Posten & Rhoda Shafter to Cass County, Iowa Historical Society. Possibly a ‘how I did this’ article.|
Progress to date: chapter 1 revision – done, following the above recommendations. Revision process begun on Chapter 2. To anyone who hasn’t compiled your research yet, start small, with one or two stories or generations. Writing these blog posts has helped me.
REFLECTION: took more time than I expected. Went to library for print copies of many books which I had accessed online. Pleased to find that Oklahoma History Society library has a complete set of the Pennsylvania Archives series plus other books that I used. Somewhat discouraged that I didn’t see duplications and confusing sections earlier.
What helped: writing down a plan for the revision. Print copy of 1st edition as well as copy of 2nd edition on computer screen for easy comparison of both versions as I edit. Time away from 1st edition allowed me to see it from a different perspective. Glad that I didn’t send 1st edition to county historical societies. Constructive criticism from relatives who have a copy of 1st edition. Research tools obtained from participation in Genealogy Do-Over. Attending a week-long webinar series about writing family histories and receiving additional input from an expert. Further refinement of proposed family history.
What didn’t help: Not being able to locate some sources again. Some files are still not organized. I have begun to use various tools more consistently so this problem should be minimized in the future.
What I learned: One step/ chapter at a time. Read previous chapters again before starting on next one. End product will be more reader-friendly with minimal duplication of information.
 Susan Posten Ellerbee, “Posten Family of Northeast Pennsylvania” (Yukon, Oklahoma: Susan Posten Ellerbee, [address for private use, ] Yukon, Oklahoma), 2012.
 Joan Ferris Curran, Madilyn Coen Crane & John H. Wray. Elizabeth Shown Mills (Ed.). Numbering Your Genealogy: Basic Systems, Complex Families and International Kin. Special Publication No. 97. (Arlington, Virginia: National Genealogical Society, 2008).
 Thomas MacAntee, The Genealogy Do-Over Workbook. (CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016); download from Amazon.com
 Elizabeth Shown Mills, Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace, 3rd ed. (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Company, 2015), 43.